Commonwealth Land Title Insurance v. Lituchy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Commonwealth Land Title Insurance v. Lituchy

188 A.D.2d 353

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 10, 1992·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order and judgment (one paper) Supreme Court, New York County (Diane A. Lebedeff, J.), entered on or about January 10, 1992, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff Commonwealth’s motion for summary judgment on its cause of action to recover on a mortgage note, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff is now entitled to summary judgment, there being sufficient to show that it has paid the required mortgage tax. As we stated on the earlier appeal (161 AD2d 517, 518), the original failure to record the mortgage and pay the tax does not render the mortgage and note unenforceable. Concur— Murphy, P. J., Carro, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order and judgment (one paper) Supreme Court, New York County (Diane A. Lebedeff, J.), entered on or about January 10, 1992, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff Commonwealth’s motion for summary judgment on its cause of action to recover on a mortgage note, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff is now entitled to summary judgment, there being sufficient to show that it has paid the required mortgage tax. As we stated on the earlier appeal (161 AD2d 517, 518), the original failure to record the mortgage and pay the tax does not render the mortgage and note unenforceable. Concur— Murphy, P. J., Carro, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.

Commonwealth Land Title Insurance v. Lituchy, 188 A.D.2d 353 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

188 A.D.2d 353 (Commonwealth Land Title Insurance v. Lituchy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related