Commonwealth ex rel. Woody v. Myers

218 A.2d 573, 421 Pa. 628, 1966 Pa. LEXIS 713
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 22, 1966
DocketNo. 318
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 218 A.2d 573 (Commonwealth ex rel. Woody v. Myers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth ex rel. Woody v. Myers, 218 A.2d 573, 421 Pa. 628, 1966 Pa. LEXIS 713 (Pa. 1966).

Opinion

Opinion,

Per Curiam,

The petition for allocatur is granted. The judgment of the Superior Court is reversed and the order of the court of original jurisdiction is vacated. The case is remanded to the last mentioned court with directions to consider the petition for a writ of habeas corpus in light of the decisions of this Court in Gom[629]*629monwealth ex rel. Branam v. Myers, 420 Pa. 77, 216 A. 2d 89 (1966), and Commonwealth ex rel. Robinson v. Myers, 420 Pa. 72, 215 A. 2d 637 (1966). If it is determined that appellant’s constitutional rights were infringed, the record shall be ordered transferred to the court of oyer and terminer. Upon transfer, said court shall provide appellant with the assistance of counsel, and hear and determine the merits of a motion for a new trial. If an appeal is filed from the judgment within a reasonable time following disposition of the motion for a new trial, it shall be considered timely in view of the circumstances presented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Woody
271 A.2d 477 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
218 A.2d 573, 421 Pa. 628, 1966 Pa. LEXIS 713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-ex-rel-woody-v-myers-pa-1966.