Commonwealth ex rel. Stone v. Shirley
This text of 10 S.E.2d 167 (Commonwealth ex rel. Stone v. Shirley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This day came again the parties, by counsel, and the court having maturely considered the petition of the petitioner, the demurrer of the respondents and printed arguments of counsel, is of opinion that the said writ of mandamus should not issue as prayed. It is therefore considered that the said demurrer should be, and is hereby, sustained, and the said petition dismissed, and that the respondents recover of the petitioners their costs by them expended about their defense herein.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 S.E.2d 167, 174 Va. 183, 1939 Va. LEXIS 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-ex-rel-stone-v-shirley-va-1939.