Commonwealth Ex Rel. Stimer v. Stimer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Stimer v. Stimer

91 Pa. Super. 586, 1927 Pa. Super. LEXIS 242

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 6, 1927·No. Appeal 376·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam,

A husband appeals from an order requiring him to1 contribute to the support of his wife. He asserts that the court was without jurisdiction because both parties wére living in the same house when complaint was filed and when the order was made. The law is otherwise: Com. v. Nugent, 85 Pa. Superior Ct. 147, 149. The Commonwealth moved to quash the appeal on the ground that it was not taken in time. The order was made February 4, 1927, and the appeal was not taken until November 14, 1927; as the statute requires appeals to be taken within three months, we must grant the motion to quash.

Appeal quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

A husband appeals from an order requiring him to1 contribute to the support of his wife. He asserts that the court was without jurisdiction because both parties wére living in the same house when complaint was filed and when the order was made. The law is otherwise: Com. v. Nugent, 85 Pa. Superior Ct. 147, 149. The Commonwealth moved to quash the appeal on the ground that it was not taken in time. The order was made February 4, 1927, and the appeal was not taken until November 14, 1927; as the statute requires appeals to be taken within three months, we must grant the motion to quash.

Appeal quashed.

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Stimer v. Stimer, 91 Pa. Super. 586, 1927 Pa. Super. LEXIS 242 (Pa. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

91 Pa. Super. 586 (Commonwealth Ex Rel. Stimer v. Stimer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related