Home/Superior Court of Pennsylvania/Commonwealth ex rel. Spensky v. Maroney

Commonwealth ex rel. Spensky v. Maroney

207 Pa. Super. 722
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth ex rel. Spensky v. Maroney. Read the opinion of the Court — 208 Pa. Super. 301 →
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 16, 1965·No. Appeal, No. 292·Published

Opinion

Opinion

Peb Curiam :

The hearing judge refused to permit the introduction by the Commonwealth of an after-discovered court record which we think should have been received in evidence. The case, therefore, is remanded for further hearing.

Flood, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth ex rel. Spensky v. Maroney, 207 Pa. Super. 722 (Pa. Ct. App. 1965).

207 Pa. Super. 722 (Commonwealth ex rel. Spensky v. Maroney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.