Commonwealth Ex Rel. Sgarlat v. Blockberger
This text of 188 A. 523 (Commonwealth Ex Rel. Sgarlat v. Blockberger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The precise question involved in this appeal has been determined by our recent cases of Commonwealth, to use, v. Hartford Acc. & Ind. Co., 306 Pa. 513, and Commonwealth v. R. L. Bonham Co., 297 Pa. 514, where it is stated at page 518: “A surety is not liable on the bond unless it appears the unpaid work was done pursuant to the contract the bond purports to cover.”
Judgment affirmed at appellants’ cost.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
188 A. 523, 324 Pa. 370, 1936 Pa. LEXIS 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-ex-rel-sgarlat-v-blockberger-pa-1936.