Commonwealth ex rel. Sablosky v. Sablosky

115 A.2d 753, 178 Pa. Super. 428, 1955 Pa. Super. LEXIS 520
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 21, 1955·No. Appeal, No. 79·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Woodsidb, J.,

This is a heartbreaking contest between two divorced, devoted parents both morally, physically and financially able to care for two small children whose custody each seeks.

We heard the case first on a supersedeas which we granted because we thought the children’s place of residence should not be changed during the school term.

On the merits we listened to two long arguments, ably presented, read the briefs, and carefully examined the entire record.

A majority of us have not been convinced that we should disturb the decision of the lower court. Judge Millbn is thoroughly familiar with the parties and their situation. In his opinion he reviewed the evidence, applied the law, and set forth the reasons for the order which he made.

We affirm on the opinion of the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth ex rel. Sablosky v. Sablosky, 115 A.2d 753, 178 Pa. Super. 428, 1955 Pa. Super. LEXIS 520 (Pa. Ct. App. 1955).

115 A.2d 753 (Commonwealth ex rel. Sablosky v. Sablosky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adoption of Arthur
609 N.E.2d 486 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1993)
Commonwealth ex rel. Wert v. Long
175 A.2d 887 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1961)
Commonwealth ex rel. Mann v. Mann
124 A.2d 432 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1956)