Commonwealth ex rel. Romano v. Banmiller
This text of 156 A.2d 825 (Commonwealth ex rel. Romano v. Banmiller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion
The relator was tried for a felonious homicide committed in the course of a robbery and was convicted by the jury of murder in the first degree with the penalty fixed at life imprisonment. His motion for a new trial was refused and judgment of sentence was entered on the verdict. On appeal to this court, the judgment of sentence was affirmed (Commonwealth v. Romano, 392 Pa. 632, 141 A. 2d 597), and the relator was duly committed to the Eastern State Penitentiary in Philadelphia, where he is now confined, for the service of his sentence.
On the relator’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, a rule was granted by the court below on July 31, 1959, calling upon the respondent warden to show cause why the writ should not issue. After a hearing on the petition, the rule was discharged and the petition dismissed by the order which the relator has appealed to this court. The opinion of Judge Kelley for the court below, reported in 19 Pa. D. & C. 2d 198, whereon we affirm, amply supports the lower court’s action.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
156 A.2d 825, 397 Pa. 606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-ex-rel-romano-v-banmiller-pa-1959.