Commonwealth Ex Rel. Rebert v. Rambler
3 A.3d 667, 607 Pa. 90, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1869
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedAugust 26, 2010
Docket106 MAL 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 3 A.3d 667 (Commonwealth Ex Rel. Rebert v. Rambler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Rebert v. Rambler, 3 A.3d 667, 607 Pa. 90, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1869 (Pa. 2010).
Opinion
*91 ORDER
AND NOW, this 26th day of August 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
The Superior Court erred as a matter of law when it vacated the trial court’s order on the basis that a federal conviction for felony mailing of extortionate communications did not constitute an infamous crime.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth ex rel. Kearney v. Rambler
32 A.3d 658 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 A.3d 667, 607 Pa. 90, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-ex-rel-rebert-v-rambler-pa-2010.