Commonwealth Ex Rel. Rebert v. Rambler

3 A.3d 667, 607 Pa. 90, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1869
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 26, 2010·No. 106 MAL 2010·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*91 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 26th day of August 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

The Superior Court erred as a matter of law when it vacated the trial court’s order on the basis that a federal conviction for felony mailing of extortionate communications did not constitute an infamous crime.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Rebert v. Rambler, 3 A.3d 667, 607 Pa. 90, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1869 (Pa. 2010).

3 A.3d 667 (Commonwealth Ex Rel. Rebert v. Rambler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth ex rel. Kearney v. Rambler
32 A.3d 658 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)