Commonwealth Ex Rel. Raschen v. Raschen

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Raschen v. Raschen

46 A.2d 589, 159 Pa. Super. 58, 1946 Pa. Super. LEXIS 329

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 10, 1946

DocketAppeal, 129

StatusPublished

This text of 46 A.2d 589 (Commonwealth Ex Rel. Raschen v. Raschen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Raschen v. Raschen, 46 A.2d 589, 159 Pa. Super. 58, 1946 Pa. Super. LEXIS 329 (Pa. Ct. App. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

In this desertion and non-support proceeding the husband was ordered on June 8, 1945, to pay the sum of $35.00 per month for the support of his wife. One month later she filed a petition to show cause why *59 the order of support should not be increased. After a hearing and a finding that no change in the circumstances and conditions was shown, the court below dismissed the petition for increase. This appeal followed.

The respondent, 71 years of age and suffering from physical infirmities, receives $125.00 a month pension from the University of Pittsburgh, and has a very small income from royalties on books, etc.

A careful consideration of the questions raised by the appellant and a review of this record fails to convince us that we should disturb the action of the court below. The order is affirmed at appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

In this desertion and non-support proceeding the husband was ordered on June 8, 1945, to pay the sum of $35.00 per month for the support of his wife. One month later she filed a petition to show cause why *59 the order of support should not be increased. After a hearing and a finding that no change in the circumstances and conditions was shown, the court below dismissed the petition for increase. This appeal followed.

The respondent, 71 years of age and suffering from physical infirmities, receives $125.00 a month pension from the University of Pittsburgh, and has a very small income from royalties on books, etc.

A careful consideration of the questions raised by the appellant and a review of this record fails to convince us that we should disturb the action of the court below. The order is affirmed at appellant’s costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 A.2d 589, 159 Pa. Super. 58, 1946 Pa. Super. LEXIS 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-ex-rel-raschen-v-raschen-pasuperct-1946.