Commonwealth ex rel. Price & Roberts v. Commissioners of Philadelphia

1 Whart. 1
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 24, 1835·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This rule must be discharged, and the mandamus denied. It appears by the affidavit of the Commissioners, that there is no money in the treasury,' except that which is wanted to defray the ordinary and current expenses of the County. The writ of mandamus is not of course. It will be granted when a plain case of necessity is shown, and where, in the discretion of the Court, it appears to be advisable. In this case we should probably stop the wheels of the county government, if the mandamus were allowed.

Rule discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth ex rel. Price & Roberts v. Commissioners of Philadelphia, 1 Whart. 1 (Pa. 1835).

1 Whart. 1 (Commonwealth ex rel. Price & Roberts v. Commissioners of Philadelphia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. City of Sheffield
183 So. 265 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1938)
Sinking Fund Commissioners of Phila. v. Phila.
188 A. 314 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Williamsport v. Citizens' Water & Gas Co.
81 A. 316 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1911)
State ex rel. Hathorn v. United States Express Co.
104 N.W. 556 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1905)
White v. Mayor of Decatur
119 Ala. 476 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1898)
State ex rel. Gourley v. Mayor of Kansas City
58 Mo. App. 124 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1894)
Board of Improvement v. McManus
15 S.W. 897 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1891)
In re Sedgeley Avenue
88 Pa. 509 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1879)
State ex rel. Watkins v. Macon County Court
68 Mo. 29 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1878)
Commonwealth v. Commissioners of Philadelphia
2 Whart. 286 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1837)
Fish v. Weatherwax
2 Johns. Cas. 215 (New York Supreme Court, 1801)