Commonwealth ex rel. Pappert v. Coy

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth ex rel. Pappert v. Coy

861 A.2d 259

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 15, 2004·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 2004, this Court having determined that the ripeness doctrine is not an impediment to further proceedings in the present matter, the order of dismissal entered by the Commonwealth Court is REVERSED, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings. See generally City Council of Phila. v. Commonwealth, 806 A.2d 975, 978-80 (Pa.Cmwlth.2002) (discussing the doctrine of ripeness), vacated and remanded on ripeness grounds, 577 Pa. 518, 847 A.2d 55 (2004).

Appellant’s request for oral argument is denied, and jurisdiction is relinquished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 2004, this Court having determined that the ripeness doctrine is not an impediment to further proceedings in the present matter, the order of dismissal entered by the Commonwealth Court is REVERSED, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings. See generally City Council of Phila. v. Commonwealth, 806 A.2d 975, 978-80 (Pa.Cmwlth.2002) (discussing the doctrine of ripeness), vacated and remanded on ripeness grounds, 577 Pa. 518, 847 A.2d 55 (2004).

Appellant’s request for oral argument is denied, and jurisdiction is relinquished.

Commonwealth ex rel. Pappert v. Coy, 861 A.2d 259 (Pa. 2004).

Pincite

861 A.2d 259 (Commonwealth ex rel. Pappert v. Coy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related