Commonwealth ex rel. Pappert v. Coy
This text of 861 A.2d 259 (Commonwealth ex rel. Pappert v. Coy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 2004, this Court having determined that the ripeness doctrine is not an impediment to further proceedings in the present matter, the order of dismissal entered by the Commonwealth Court is REVERSED, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings. See generally City Council of Phila. v. Commonwealth, 806 A.2d 975, 978-80 (Pa.Cmwlth.2002) (discussing the doctrine of ripeness), vacated and remanded on ripeness grounds, 577 Pa. 518, 847 A.2d 55 (2004).
Appellant’s request for oral argument is denied, and jurisdiction is relinquished.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
861 A.2d 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-ex-rel-pappert-v-coy-pa-2004.