Commonwealth ex rel. Olecki v. Maroney
This text of 204 A.2d 449 (Commonwealth ex rel. Olecki v. Maroney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion
Petitioner requests us to review the dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The basic allegation of the petition was that petitioner had been denied counsel at the entry of his plea of guilty.
Our examination of the record persuades us that the matter should be remanded for further consideration below in light of this Court’s decisions today in Commonwealth ex rel. O’Lock v. Rundle, 415 Pa. 515, 204 A. 2d 439 (1964), and in Commonwealth ex rel. Goodfellow v. Rundle, 415 Pa. 528, 204 A. 2d 446 (1964).
The petition for allocatur is granted, as is the petition to proceed in forma pauperis. The orders of the Superior Court and the Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna County are vacated. The record is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna County for further consideration.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
204 A.2d 449, 415 Pa. 543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-ex-rel-olecki-v-maroney-pa-1964.