Commonwealth ex rel. McClure v. Gedikoh

101 Pa. 354, 1882 Pa. LEXIS 263
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 20, 1882
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 101 Pa. 354 (Commonwealth ex rel. McClure v. Gedikoh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth ex rel. McClure v. Gedikoh, 101 Pa. 354, 1882 Pa. LEXIS 263 (Pa. 1882).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Gordon

delivered the opinion of the court, November 20th 1882.

“All laws and parts of laws now in force, relative to the sale of vinous, spirituous, malt or brewed liquors, or any admixtures thereof, in the county of Allegheny, or any part thereof, be and the same are hereby repealed.” (Act 3d April 1872, sec. 1. Br. Purd. 951.)

The language above recited is so general and all embracing in its character that a misconception of the legislative intent-is impossible. It repeals not only all laws but-all parts of laws then in force, relative to the sale of intoxicating liquors, in the county of Allegheny. It thus, so far as this county .was concerned, swept away the Act of 1855 and every part of it. It is very true that the later act does hot supply the second section of the former, but this omission may be accounted for under the supposition that the legislature regarded the making of the offence of selling liquors on Sunday a misdemeanor punishable by fine and imprisonment, as all sufficient for its suppression. At all events, this shows that in framing the Act of 1872, that part of the Act of 1855 was not overlooked. It is, however, not necessary to attempt to account for either the omissions or commissions of the Act of 1872, since at the very head of it stands the repealing clause which we have cited, and that leaves no law general or special, respecting the sale of intoxicating liquors, of force in the county of Allegheny, saving and excepting only those special laws for which the Act itself provides. It follows, that there is no prohibition of, nor penalty against, the [356]*356sale of such liquors, whether on Sunday of any other day, except that found in the Act of 1872.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

County Commissioners v. Thomas
190 A. 681 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 Pa. 354, 1882 Pa. LEXIS 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-ex-rel-mcclure-v-gedikoh-pa-1882.