Commonwealth Ex Rel. Marshall v. Maroney

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Marshall v. Maroney

181 A.2d 852, 198 Pa. Super. 85, 1962 Pa. Super. LEXIS 653

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJune 13, 1962

DocketAppeal, 138

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 181 A.2d 852 (Commonwealth Ex Rel. Marshall v. Maroney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Marshall v. Maroney, 181 A.2d 852, 198 Pa. Super. 85, 1962 Pa. Super. LEXIS 653 (Pa. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Rhodes, P. J.,

Relator was indicted in the Court of Quarter Sessions of Allegheny County, No. 181, September Sessions, 1959, on a charge of possession of, and dealing in, narcotics. Being represented by counsel, relator entered a plea of guilty to the indictment and was sentenced on November 2, 1959, to a term of not less than two and one-half years nor more than five years in the Western State Penitentiary. 1 His petition for writ of habeas corpus filed in the court below was dismissed, without hearing, on January 10, 1962, by Judge van der Voort. Relator has appealed.

*87 On appeal relator objects to an alleged illegal search and seizure of narcotics found in his possession. Since a plea of guilty had been entered, evidence normally used to obtain a conviction is not in issue, nor can such matter, under these circumstances, be raised by habeas corpus. Com. ex rel. Bollinger v. Myers, 185 Pa. Superior Ct. 160, 162, 137 A. 2d 843; Com. ex rel. Sickler v. Myers, 188 Pa. Superior Ct. 541, 543, 149 A. 2d 178; Com. ex rel. Peiffer v. Banmiller, 193 Pa. Superior Ct. 480, 166 A. 2d 324. The guilty plea obviated the necessity of a trial; hence, no question of a trial or conviction based on illegal evidence obtained through a possibly unreasonable search and seizure arises or is involved. The statement of the Supreme Court of the United States, in an analogous situation, in Townsend v. Burke, 334 U. S. 736, 738, 68 S. Ct. 1252, 92 L. Ed. 1690, 1692, applies equally here: “In this present case no confession was used because the plea of guilty in open court dispensed with proof of the crime.” See Com. ex rel. Roberts v. Keenan, 170 Pa. Superior Ct. 282, 289, 85 A. 2d 678. Cf. Com. ex rel. Miller v. Myers, 187 Pa. Superior Ct. 565, 567, 146 A. 2d 145.

The order is affirmed.

1

Now State Correctional Institution at Pittsburgh. Act of October 22, 1959, P, L. 1356.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Rhodes, P. J.,

Relator was indicted in the Court of Quarter Sessions of Allegheny County, No. 181, September Sessions, 1959, on a charge of possession of, and dealing in, narcotics. Being represented by counsel, relator entered a plea of guilty to the indictment and was sentenced on November 2, 1959, to a term of not less than two and one-half years nor more than five years in the Western State Penitentiary. 1 His petition for writ of habeas corpus filed in the court below was dismissed, without hearing, on January 10, 1962, by Judge van der Voort. Relator has appealed.

*87 On appeal relator objects to an alleged illegal search and seizure of narcotics found in his possession. Since a plea of guilty had been entered, evidence normally used to obtain a conviction is not in issue, nor can such matter, under these circumstances, be raised by habeas corpus. Com. ex rel. Bollinger v. Myers, 185 Pa. Superior Ct. 160, 162, 137 A. 2d 843; Com. ex rel. Sickler v. Myers, 188 Pa. Superior Ct. 541, 543, 149 A. 2d 178; Com. ex rel. Peiffer v. Banmiller, 193 Pa. Superior Ct. 480, 166 A. 2d 324. The guilty plea obviated the necessity of a trial; hence, no question of a trial or conviction based on illegal evidence obtained through a possibly unreasonable search and seizure arises or is involved. The statement of the Supreme Court of the United States, in an analogous situation, in Townsend v. Burke, 334 U. S. 736, 738, 68 S. Ct. 1252, 92 L. Ed. 1690, 1692, applies equally here: “In this present case no confession was used because the plea of guilty in open court dispensed with proof of the crime.” See Com. ex rel. Roberts v. Keenan, 170 Pa. Superior Ct. 282, 289, 85 A. 2d 678. Cf. Com. ex rel. Miller v. Myers, 187 Pa. Superior Ct. 565, 567, 146 A. 2d 145.

The order is affirmed.

1

Now State Correctional Institution at Pittsburgh. Act of October 22, 1959, P, L. 1356.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 A.2d 852, 198 Pa. Super. 85, 1962 Pa. Super. LEXIS 653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-ex-rel-marshall-v-maroney-pasuperct-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack