Commonwealth ex rel. Lay v. Myers
This text of 203 A.2d 594 (Commonwealth ex rel. Lay v. Myers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion
The cause is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County for further consideration and appropriate proceedings in the light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S. Ct. 792, 9 L. Ed. 2d 799, in order that Lloyd Lester Lay may have an opportunity to establish by evidence the material averments of his petition and the Commonwealth may have an opportunity to affirm or deny or rebut this evi[727]*727deuce. After hearing the evidence, the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County shall make its findings and enter an appropriate order of judgment consistent with the evidence and the law, and the opinion of the Supreme Court in Gideon v. Wainwright, supra, and in accord with right and justice, the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution and the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The reasons for this action are to be found in our recent opinion in Commonwealth ex rel. Goodfellow v. Rundle, 203 Pa. Superior Ct. 419, 201 A. 2d 615 (1964).
Order reversed and cause remanded with a procedendo.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
203 A.2d 594, 204 Pa. Super. 726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-ex-rel-lay-v-myers-pasuperct-1964.