Commonwealth ex rel. Krol v. Russell

217 A.2d 738, 421 Pa. 32, 1966 Pa. LEXIS 611
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 22, 1966·No. Appeal, No. 304·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Me. Justice Eagen,

This is an appeal from an order below dismissing an action in habeas corpus without hearing.

Appellant, while represented by counsel, plead guilty generally to the charge of murder. After hearing, a three-judge court entered a finding of guilty of murder in the first degree, and imposed a sentence of imprisonment for life.

Appellant now attacks the validity of his confinement and judgment of sentence under the rule enunciated in Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964).

The writ was correctly denied. The rulings in Commonwealth ex rel. Pomoles v. Myers, 418 Pa. 369, 211 A. 2d 483 (1965); Commonwealth ex rel. Adderley v. Myers, 418 Pa. 366, 211 A. 2d 481 (1965); and, Commonwealth ex rel. Blackshear v. Myers, 419 Pa. 151, 213 A. 2d 378 (1965) are controlling.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth ex rel. Krol v. Russell, 217 A.2d 738, 421 Pa. 32, 1966 Pa. LEXIS 611 (Pa. 1966).

217 A.2d 738 (Commonwealth ex rel. Krol v. Russell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Escobedo v. Illinois
378 U.S. 478 (Supreme Court, 1964)
Commonwealth ex rel. Adderley v. Myers
211 A.2d 481 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)
Commonwealth ex rel. Pomales v. Myers
211 A.2d 483 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)
Commonwealth ex rel. Blackshear v. Myers
213 A.2d 378 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)