Commonwealth ex rel. Kittrell v. Banmiller

159 A.2d 576, 192 Pa. Super. 133
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 13, 1960
DocketAppeal, No. 39
StatusPublished

This text of 159 A.2d 576 (Commonwealth ex rel. Kittrell v. Banmiller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth ex rel. Kittrell v. Banmiller, 159 A.2d 576, 192 Pa. Super. 133 (Pa. Ct. App. 1960).

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal by Roy W. Kittrell from the order of the Court of Quarter Sessions of York County discharging a rule to show cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be issued.

The only question raised by the appellant in this appeal is that his constitutional guarantee of due process was violated because stenographic notes of his trial were not taken. In the absence of a request from the defendant, failure to have notes of testimony taken at the trial does not constitute a denial of due process or any constitutional right: Com. ex rel. Koffel v. Myers, 184 Pa. Superior Ct. 270, 273, 133 A. 2d 570.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Koffel v. Myers
133 A.2d 570 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 A.2d 576, 192 Pa. Super. 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-ex-rel-kittrell-v-banmiller-pasuperct-1960.