Commonwealth ex rel. Kirkpatrick v. American Life Insurance

32 A. 405, 170 Pa. 170, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1378
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 18, 1895·No. Appeal, No. 27·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The opinion of the common pleas which was affirmed by this court in the case of Miller’s Appeal, 162 Pa. 586, disposes of the appellant’s contention in the present case. The appellant has no lien upon the assets of the company prior to its dissolution, and it was certainly not the intention of this court to give her one when we decided that she was entitled to a return of the policy for $6,000, or when we adjudged that the “ defendant company ” pay to the plaintiff the sum of six thousand dollars with interest from October 4, 1889. Riegel, Appellant, v. American Life Ins. Co., 153 Pa. 134. The appellant is simply the holder of a policy, for $6,000 without preference, and is entitled only to a dividend of the assets in the hands of the receiver along with all other creditors of the same class.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth ex rel. Kirkpatrick v. American Life Insurance, 32 A. 405, 170 Pa. 170, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1378 (Pa. 1895).

32 A. 405 (Commonwealth ex rel. Kirkpatrick v. American Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boyd v. Wright
96 S.E. 388 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1918)