Commonwealth ex rel. Kentucky Railroad Commission v. Illinois Central Railroad

299 S.W.2d 803, 1957 Ky. LEXIS 429
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedMarch 8, 1957
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 299 S.W.2d 803 (Commonwealth ex rel. Kentucky Railroad Commission v. Illinois Central Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth ex rel. Kentucky Railroad Commission v. Illinois Central Railroad, 299 S.W.2d 803, 1957 Ky. LEXIS 429 (Ky. Ct. App. 1957).

Opinion

MONTGOMERY, Judge.

The right to discontinue operation of the last two passenger trains between Fulton and Louisville via Paducah is involved.

The appellee for many years operated daily two passenger trains each way. Trains Nos. 101 and 102 were operated in the daytime. Their discontinuance was upheld on March 5, 1954. Railroad Commission of Ky. v. Illinois Cent. R. Co., Ky., 265 S.W.2d 797. Trains Nos. 103 and 104 were operated at nighttime.

On October 13, 1954, appellee filed with the Kentucky Railroad Commission an application ' for authority to discontinue the operation of the two remaining passenger trains. After hearings were held, the Commission disapproved the application. Ap-pellee gave notice of its intention to discontinue the trains. The Commission then filed this action under KRS 276.370 to enforce its order. Judgment was rendered in the circuit court directing the Commission to enter an order permitting appellee to discontinue the operation, from which the Commission has appealed.

The authority sought by appellee is governed by KRS 276.480, the pertinent part of which is:

[805]*805" * * * the Railroad Commission * * * shall have the power and it shall he its duty to authorize common carriers by railroad to discontinue passenger service by railroad on any line of railroad or branch thereof in this state, whenever in the opinion of said Railroad Commission any such passenger service by railroad has been and is being carried on at a loss and there is no reasonable probability that such condition will in the future change for the better, or whenever any passenger service by railroad has for any reason become unnecessary in the public interest ; * * * ”

Appellee contends that the two passenger trains were being operated at a loss and there was no reasonable probability that such condition would change for the better. The burden of proof was on the appellee. Commuters’ Committee v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 170 Pa. Super. 596, 88 A.2d 420. Appellants urge that: (1) appellee failed to sustain the burden of proof as to loss; (2) any loss sustained was due to a lack of good faith effort on the part of appellee to avoid it; (3) the services are necessary in the public interest; and (4) the title of the legislative Act is defective.

The circuit court and the Commission both found that appellee had sustained a loss in the operation of the trains. Appellee’s evidence of the financial loss sustained was based upon the accounts of the railroad company which were shown to have been kept in accordance with the regulations of the Interstate Commerce Commission. The evidence was prepared in accordance with a formula adopted by the National Association of Railway and Utility Commissioners. From the evidence as brought up to date before the trial in the circuit court, the annual net losses on the operation of the two trains were shown to have been $713,169 for the twelve months’ period ending May 31, 1954, $779,701 for the year 1954, and $731,871 for the year 1955. The net out of pocket losses, that is, the difference between the revenue and the actual operating expense for the same trains for the same periods, were $154,246, $213,105, and $194,844, respectively. The findings of the Commission and the circuit court as to loss were supported by substantial evidence.

The evidence was insufficient to show that the losses in passenger revenue had been offset by freight revenue accruing from increased rates. It was contended that the appellee, with other railroad companies, had sought and obtained authorization for an increase in freight rates. The passenger revenue deficit was one of several bases urged in justification of the increase. It is admitted that appellee as a railroad system is operating profitably enough to pay dividends, but there is no showing as to what part of the profit, if any, arising from the increased freight revenue could or should have been allocated to the Fulton-Louisville line, or whether such allocation would have been sufficient to overcome the deficit claimed.

In addition, the pertinent statute indicates that the loss to be considered by the Commission is confined to the loss arising from the lack of revenue “on any line of railroad or branch thereof in this State” when “such passenger service * * * has been and is being carried on at a loss”. The phrase “such passenger service” refers to the service “on any line * * * or branch thereof in this State”. This is a narrow construction of the statute, but it so reads. The harshness of such an interpretation is suggested in one of the briefs for appellants. In view of the peculiar language of the statute, many of the authorities cited by both parties are not applicable.

For these reasons, there is no merit in appellants’ contention that appellee by obtaining the freight rate increase is es-topped from prosecuting its application for discontinuance of the trains.

[806]*806It is insisted that the loss sustained by ap-pellee was due to a lack of good faith effort on its part to avoid it. The protestants sought to show that the schedules were inconveniently timed; the station and terminal facilities were uncomfortable and unattractive; convenient ticket offices were not maintained; train equipment was old, inadequate, uncomfortable, and frequently dirty; and there was a lack of promotional effort to increase passenger traffic. Other witnesses for the protestants indicated that they would be satisfied with the service as furnished if it could be continued. The evidence shows that appellee had sought to arrange the schedules to suit the convenience of its customers; the continued losses did not justify improvement of the passenger station or terminal facilities, or the maintenance of more convenient ticket offices; and the train equipment had been renovated, air-conditioned, and kept clean. It was adequate for the traffic available. In answer to the claim that the use of a more modern train would cut the loss, appellee introduced proof to the effect that the operation of a modern streamliner type train, with diner and observation car, had failed to produce such a result. This train was operated for two years and eight months, ending December 4, 1949, without successfully stimulating passenger traffic to a profitable return.

The Commission determined that “it further appears applicant has shown a lack of good faith effort to encourage use of its passenger service and avoid such loss”. The circuit court held that the finding of the Commission in this respect was not supported by the evidence. We are of the opinion that KRS 276.480 contemplates a good faith effort on the part of the applicant to avoid losses from operation of its passenger train. Any other construction of the statute would impute an intent and purpose to the Legislature to disregard the public interest, which is not warranted. Gardner v. Commerce Commission, 400 Ill. 123, 79 N.E.2d 71; Southern Pac. Co. v.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
299 S.W.2d 803, 1957 Ky. LEXIS 429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-ex-rel-kentucky-railroad-commission-v-illinois-central-kyctapp-1957.