Commonwealth ex rel. Jones v. Board of Probation & Parole

3 Pa. Commw. 594, 1971 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 397
CourtCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 14, 1971
DocketNo. 623 C.D. 1971
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 Pa. Commw. 594 (Commonwealth ex rel. Jones v. Board of Probation & Parole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth ex rel. Jones v. Board of Probation & Parole, 3 Pa. Commw. 594, 1971 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 397 (Pa. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

Per Curiam

Opinion,

Petitioner here raises the question of whether the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole has the power to recommit a parolee who has breached the conditions of his parole by the commission of a crime , of which he is subsequently found guilty without giving him credit for the time spent on parole and, if it has the statutory power, is such a recommitment without credit for time spent on parole violative of the provisions of the United States Constitution.

These legal issues were discussed and resolved by this Court in Williams v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 3 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 633 (1971).

[596]*596The conclusion is against the position of petitioner.

We therefore make the following

Order

The Board’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is hereby granted and the plaintiff’s complaint in mandamus is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth ex rel. Miles v. Cuyler
389 A.2d 720 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Pa. Commw. 594, 1971 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-ex-rel-jones-v-board-of-probation-parole-pacommwct-1971.