Commonwealth ex rel. Holben v. Russell

208 A.2d 861, 418 Pa. 22, 1965 Pa. LEXIS 554
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 20, 1965·No. Appeal, No. 40·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Relator, represented by counsel at trial and at preliminary hearing, was convicted of murder in the second degree by a jury and subsequently sentenced to 7% to 15 years imprisonment. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus underlying the present appeal was dismissed by the court of common pleas without hearing, as were two previous petitions.

The court below concluded that the majority of the allegations contained in the present petition, even if true, would in no way warrant a hearing or in any respect justify the issuance of a writ. The remaining, more fundamental allegations were found to be directly contradicted by the record and devoid of merit.

We have examined the record and find nothing in any of the petition’s numerous allegations, read in the light most favorable to petitioner, which even suggest any factual or legal basis for disturbing the determination of the court below.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth ex rel. Holben v. Russell, 208 A.2d 861, 418 Pa. 22, 1965 Pa. LEXIS 554 (Pa. 1965).

208 A.2d 861 (Commonwealth ex rel. Holben v. Russell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Henderson
253 A.2d 109 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1969)
Commonwealth v. Cline
231 A.2d 430 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1967)
Commonwealth v. Welch
229 A.2d 737 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1967)
Commonwealth ex rel. Norman v. Stitzel
228 A.2d 373 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1967)
Commonwealth ex rel. West v. Myers
222 A.2d 918 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1966)
Commonwealth ex rel. Fink v. Rundle
222 A.2d 717 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1966)
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Davis v. Maroney
210 A.2d 920 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)