Commonwealth ex rel. Henderson v. O'Donnell
This text of 7 Pa. Super. 49 (Commonwealth ex rel. Henderson v. O'Donnell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appeal from the original judgment in the quo warranto proceedings is now pending in the Supreme Court, and it is very clear that the court having jurisdiction to review those proceedings has jurisdiction to review the supplemental proceedings from which appeals have been taken to this court. The appeals do not involve the possession or ownership of real or personal property or any right, the value of which can be measured in money. So far as the questions of appellate jurisdiction are concerned, they are governed by the same principle as the case of Rosenberry v. Rosenberry, 180 Pa. 221, where the question was raised by counsel and jurisdiction of the appeal was entertained by the Supreme Court. .
Now, March 9, 1898, the above mentioned appeal is certified at the cost of the appellant to the Supreme Court for hearing and decision.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 Pa. Super. 49, 1898 Pa. Super. LEXIS 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-ex-rel-henderson-v-odonnell-pasuperct-1898.