Commonwealth ex rel. Helwig v. Maroney

167 A.2d 326, 194 Pa. Super. 16
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 14, 1960
DocketAppeal, No. 268
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 167 A.2d 326 (Commonwealth ex rel. Helwig v. Maroney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth ex rel. Helwig v. Maroney, 167 A.2d 326, 194 Pa. Super. 16 (Pa. Ct. App. 1960).

Opinion

Opinion by

Watkins, J.,

The order of the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County dismissing this petition for a writ of error coram nobis, habeas corpus, issuance of subpoenas, and a new trial, is affirmed on the opinion of President Judge Evans, for the court below, reported in 24 Pa. D. & C. 2d 93.

Most of the complaints contained in this petition have already been disposed of by this Court in affirming the judgment and sentence in Com. v. Helwig, 184 Pa. Superior Ct. 370, 134 A. 2d 694 (1957), and by the Federal Court in dismissing a similar writ of habeas corpus in Helwig v. Angelo Cavell, 171 F. Supp. 417.

For a learned discussion of the availability of the writ of error coram nobis, see the opinion of Judge Wright, in Com. v. Taylor, 193 Pa. Superior Ct. 360, 165 A. 2d 390. It has been repeatedly held that neither this writ nor the writ of habeas corpus may be used as a substitute for an appeal in the matters complained of in this petition. Commonwealth ex rel. Wilkins v. Banmiller, 401 Pa. 347, 164 A. 2d 333.

A careful examination of the record in this case and the attitude of this appellant makes a comment in the 20 U. of P. L. Rev., p. 214 (1958) particularly apropos: “Although, of course, miscarriages of justice should be corrected, some means should be devised to prevent the abuse of justice by petitioners who, in some cases, may reach the appellate courts three or four times on what are essentially the same issues. The legal profession should concern itself with this problem since it has a definite relation to the administration of criminal justice in general.”

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth ex rel. Rutkowski v. Reeder
191 A.2d 690 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1963)
Commonwealth v. Orsino
178 A.2d 843 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1962)
Commonwealth ex rel. Garrison v. Myers
23 Pa. D. & C.2d 519 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 A.2d 326, 194 Pa. Super. 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-ex-rel-helwig-v-maroney-pasuperct-1960.