Commonwealth ex rel. Hargrove v. Maroney

215 A.2d 635, 420 Pa. 120, 1966 Pa. LEXIS 745
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 4, 1966·No. Appeal, No. 243·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from an order in the court below dismissing an action of habeas corpus.

The order was correct. The reasons assigned in support of the issuance of the writ are devoid of merit. See, Commonwealth ex rel. Blackshear v. Myers, 419 Pa. 151, 213 A. 2d 378 (1965), and Commonwealth ex rel. Swiger v. Maroney, 420 Pa. 34, 215 A. 2d 636 (1966).

Order affirmed.

Mr. Justice Cohen took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth ex rel. Hargrove v. Maroney, 215 A.2d 635, 420 Pa. 120, 1966 Pa. LEXIS 745 (Pa. 1966).

215 A.2d 635 (Commonwealth ex rel. Hargrove v. Maroney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brady v. Board of Review
704 A.2d 547 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1997)
Commonwealth v. Hargrove
342 A.2d 77 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1975)
United States ex rel. Hargrove v. Maroney
255 F. Supp. 713 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1966)
Commonwealth ex rel. Meholchick v. Rundle
215 A.2d 636 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1966)