Commonwealth ex rel. Gray v. Keenan
This text of 24 Pa. D. & C.2d 201 (Commonwealth ex rel. Gray v. Keenan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Blair County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order
Now, October 11,1960, the above-entitled action consisting of a petition for writ of habeas corpus having come on for hearing, and
It appearing that defendant first complains that he was not given a preliminary hearing and that he was improperly treated by the arresting officer and the warrant was not read to him by the arresting officer, but it also appearing from the record that defendant by writing waived the preliminary hearing and entered his plea of nolo contendere, which was heard in open court; that at the court hearing the record shows that defendant refused the court’s offer of counsel to represent him; that sentence was imposed thereunder, and defendant in his writ asks that he be returned to this county for the purpose of offering further testimony, and
It appearing under the law defendant having proceeded in the above outlined manner this court finds [202]*202he is not entitled to a writ of habeas corpus and the petition of defendant is denied in its entirety.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 Pa. D. & C.2d 201, 1960 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-ex-rel-gray-v-keenan-pactcomplblair-1960.