Commonwealth ex rel. Gorman v. Maroney

211 A.2d 21, 206 Pa. Super. 5, 1965 Pa. Super. LEXIS 749
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 17, 1965·No. Appeal, No. 182·Published

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Relator’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus was dismissed without a hearing. Although he signed a statement in which he admitted that he understood the charges against him, had no defense to the charges against him, and had been offered but refused counsel, there is nothing else in the record to show that he intelligently and willingly waived his constitutional right to counsel. Under our decision in Commonwealth ex rel. Ross v. Botula, 206 Pa. Superior Ct. 1, 211 A. 2d 42, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Fayette County is reversed and the record is remanded to that court with directions to hold a hearing on the petition.

Eevin, P. J., dissents because the relator signed an express waiver of counsel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth ex rel. Gorman v. Maroney, 211 A.2d 21, 206 Pa. Super. 5, 1965 Pa. Super. LEXIS 749 (Pa. Ct. App. 1965).

211 A.2d 21 (Commonwealth ex rel. Gorman v. Maroney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Ross v. Botula
211 A.2d 42 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)