Commonwealth ex rel. Drum v. Gaige
This text of 94 Pa. 193 (Commonwealth ex rel. Drum v. Gaige) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court was entered,
It is unnecessary to decide whether the judgment of the court below, without a service of the writ upon the defendant, was regular, as upon the merits we are of opinion that the relator showed no right under the Constitution and laws to the office held by the defendant, and we affirm this judgment upon the opinion of the learned judge below.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 Pa. 193, 1880 Pa. LEXIS 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-ex-rel-drum-v-gaige-pa-1880.