Commonwealth ex rel. City of Titusville v. Clark
Opinion
Opinion by
The contention here arises upon a case stated. The sole question at issue is the constitutionality of an ordinance of the city of Titusville, under which a license tax is sought to [518] be collected. The municipal legislation is alleged to be in violation of the provisions of the federal constitution, and of the constitution of the commonwealth. The sentence imposed by the court below affects the liberty of the defendant. These are important matters, and would ordinarily, lead us to a full expression of our views. The court below has, however, filed an opinion in which all the authorities seemed to have been examined with care. No question raised seems to have been overlooked or failed of adequate consideration. The conclusions reached put in application the principles adequately discussed. A repetition of the discussion would throw no additional light upon the case. We are all of opinion that the judgment of the court below should be sustained.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
10 Pa. Super. 507 (Commonwealth ex rel. City of Titusville v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.