Commonwealth Ex Rel. Cabey v. Rundle

216 A.2d 112, 207 Pa. Super. 726, 1966 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1167
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedFebruary 1, 1966
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 216 A.2d 112 (Commonwealth Ex Rel. Cabey v. Rundle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Cabey v. Rundle, 216 A.2d 112, 207 Pa. Super. 726, 1966 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1167 (Pa. Ct. App. 1966).

Opinion

207 Pa. Superior Ct. 726 (1966)

Commonwealth ex rel. Cabey, Appellant,
v.
Rundle.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted December 13, 1965.
February 1, 1966.

William Cabey, appellant, in propria persona.

William G. Klenk, II, and Joseph M. Smith, Assistant District Attorneys, F. Emmett Fitzpatrick, Jr., First Assistant District Attorney, and James C. Crumlish, Jr., District Attorney, for appellee.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 A.2d 112, 207 Pa. Super. 726, 1966 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-ex-rel-cabey-v-rundle-pasuperct-1966.