Commonwealth ex rel. Altizer v. Hendricks

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth ex rel. Altizer v. Hendricks

190 A.2d 348, 200 Pa. Super. 485

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 18, 1963

DocketAppeal, No. 45

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 190 A.2d 348 (Commonwealth ex rel. Altizer v. Hendricks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth ex rel. Altizer v. Hendricks, 190 A.2d 348, 200 Pa. Super. 485 (Pa. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The order of the court below dismissing petition for writ of habeas corpus is affirmed- on the opinion of Judge Waters of the Court of Common Pleas No. 4 of Philadelphia County, as reported in 29 Pa. D. & C. 2d 550. However, we wish to point out that the [487]*487question of jurisdiction raised in this petition is without merit in that the testimony clearly established that the crime charged was committed in Philadelphia.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The order of the court below dismissing petition for writ of habeas corpus is affirmed- on the opinion of Judge Waters of the Court of Common Pleas No. 4 of Philadelphia County, as reported in 29 Pa. D. & C. 2d 550. However, we wish to point out that the [487]*487question of jurisdiction raised in this petition is without merit in that the testimony clearly established that the crime charged was committed in Philadelphia.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 A.2d 348, 200 Pa. Super. 485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-ex-rel-altizer-v-hendricks-pasuperct-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack