Commonwealth ex rel. Altizer v. Hendricks

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth ex rel. Altizer v. Hendricks

190 A.2d 348, 200 Pa. Super. 485

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 18, 1963·No. Appeal, No. 45·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The order of the court below dismissing petition for writ of habeas corpus is affirmed- on the opinion of Judge Waters of the Court of Common Pleas No. 4 of Philadelphia County, as reported in 29 Pa. D. & C. 2d 550. However, we wish to point out that the [487]*487question of jurisdiction raised in this petition is without merit in that the testimony clearly established that the crime charged was committed in Philadelphia.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The order of the court below dismissing petition for writ of habeas corpus is affirmed- on the opinion of Judge Waters of the Court of Common Pleas No. 4 of Philadelphia County, as reported in 29 Pa. D. & C. 2d 550. However, we wish to point out that the [487]*487question of jurisdiction raised in this petition is without merit in that the testimony clearly established that the crime charged was committed in Philadelphia.

Commonwealth ex rel. Altizer v. Hendricks, 190 A.2d 348, 200 Pa. Super. 485 (Pa. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

190 A.2d 348 (Commonwealth ex rel. Altizer v. Hendricks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related