Commonwealth ex rel. Alexovits v. Mamatey
This text of 101 A. 731 (Commonwealth ex rel. Alexovits v. Mamatey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The complaint of the appellants at the time this quo warranto proceeding was instituted was that the appellees were unlawfully holding offices, and the writ was invoked to oust them therefrom. On January 1, 1917, the term of the office to which each of them had been elected expired, and, when this appeal was argued, at a later [329]*329date, the question involved was purely academic. The facts are either admitted or undisputed, but we could not enter judgment of ouster, for the reason stated, even if there were merit in appellants’ contention.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
101 A. 731, 257 Pa. 327, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-ex-rel-alexovits-v-mamatey-pa-1917.