Commonwealth Banking & Trust Co. v. Smith & Oby Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Commonwealth Banking & Trust Co. v. Smith & Oby Co.

164 N.E. 751, 119 Ohio St. 514, 119 Ohio St. (N.S.) 514, 1928 Ohio LEXIS 325

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 28, 1928

Docket20744

StatusPublished

This text of 164 N.E. 751 (Commonwealth Banking & Trust Co. v. Smith & Oby Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth Banking & Trust Co. v. Smith & Oby Co., 164 N.E. 751, 119 Ohio St. 514, 119 Ohio St. (N.S.) 514, 1928 Ohio LEXIS 325 (Ohio 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

While this case has been certified to this court under the conflict provision of the Con stitution, the record discloses that th'e judgment certified for review is a reversal of the court of common pleas upon the weight of the evidence, and that no other error is found in the record, a determination of the correctness of the judgment of the court below requiring a determination of the weight of the evidence. This court is not required to determine the weight of the evidence, and we there *516 fore find it onr duty to affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals, which is accordingly done.

Judgment affirmed.

Day, Allen, Kinkade, Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

While this case has been certified to this court under the conflict provision of the Con stitution, the record discloses that th'e judgment certified for review is a reversal of the court of common pleas upon the weight of the evidence, and that no other error is found in the record, a determination of the correctness of the judgment of the court below requiring a determination of the weight of the evidence. This court is not required to determine the weight of the evidence, and we there *516 fore find it onr duty to affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals, which is accordingly done.

Judgment affirmed.

Day, Allen, Kinkade, Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

164 N.E. 751, 119 Ohio St. 514, 119 Ohio St. (N.S.) 514, 1928 Ohio LEXIS 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-banking-trust-co-v-smith-oby-co-ohio-1928.