Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Crozier, A.
This text of Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Crozier, A. (Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Crozier, A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 60 MAP 2019 : Appellant : : Appeal from the Order of the : Montgomery County Court of v. : Common Pleas, Criminal Division, at : No. CP-46-CR-0002065-2012 dated : December 6, 2018. ANTHONY MICHAEL CROZIER, : : Appellee :
ORDER
PER CURIAM DECIDED: October 21, 2020
AND NOW, this 21st day of October, 2020, the order of the court of common pleas
is REVERSED. See Commonwealth v. Lacombe, ___ A.3d ___, 2020 WL 4150283 (Pa.
filed July 21, 2020) (holding that Subchapter I of Sex Offender Registration and
Notification Act, 42 Pa.C.S. §§9799.51-9799.76, does not constitute criminal punishment
and not an ex post facto law).
Anthony Crozier’s “Application for Oral Argument” is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Crozier, A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-aplt-v-crozier-a-pa-2020.