Common v. People

28 Ill. App. 230, 1888 Ill. App. LEXIS 28
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided December 8, 1888·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Upton, J.

We think the appellant showed due diligence in his endeavor to procure the testimony of the witnesses, in the affidavit named for the trial, and that the trial court should have granted appellant’s motion for a continuance, or conrpelied appellee to have admitted the affidavits under the statute. The evidence in our judgment was very material and could not have failed to have had an important influence with the jury on the trial of the' cause.

Under the facts in this record and circumstances shown, we think the trial court should have granted appellant’s motion for a new trial of the cause, and for these reasons, the judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Heversed cmd remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Common v. People, 28 Ill. App. 230, 1888 Ill. App. LEXIS 28 (Ill. Ct. App. 1888).

28 Ill. App. 230 (Common v. People) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Common v. People
39 Ill. App. 31 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1890)