Common Council of Alexandria v. Mandeville
This text of 2 D.C. 224 (Common Council of Alexandria v. Mandeville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
refused to permit such evidence to be given, deeming it irrelevant and immaterial.
He also offered evidence that the pavement was badly done.
But the Court rejected the evidence; and in the case of the Common Council v. Sivann, at the same term, decided (Thruston, J., absent,) that it was only competent for the defendant to show that the contract made by the Common Council for the pavement was not fairly made, or fraudulent, or not with good faith,
Judgment for the plaintiff
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 D.C. 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/common-council-of-alexandria-v-mandeville-circtddc-1820.