Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Common Cause/Ohio v. Ohio Elections Comm.

Common Cause/Ohio v. Ohio Elections Comm.

785 N.E.2d 757, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1502
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 27, 2003
Docket2002-2137
StatusPublished

This text of 785 N.E.2d 757 (Common Cause/Ohio v. Ohio Elections Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Common Cause/Ohio v. Ohio Elections Comm., 785 N.E.2d 757, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1502 (Ohio 2003).

Opinion

Franklin App. Nos. 02AP-439, 02AP-440 and 02AP-441, 150 Ohio App.3d 31, 2002-Ohio-5965. Discretionary appeal allowed on Proposition of Law No. I.

O’Connor, J., concurs. Brogan, Farmer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur in part because they would allow both propositions of law. Moyer, C.J., F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent [1503]*1503James A. Brogan, J., of the Second Appellate District, sitting for Resnick, J. Sheila G. Farmer, J., of the Fifth Appellate District, sitting for Cook, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Common Cause/Ohio v. Ohio Elections Commission
779 N.E.2d 766 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
785 N.E.2d 757, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/common-causeohio-v-ohio-elections-comm-ohio-2003.