Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Saffron
This text of Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Saffron (Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Saffron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 * * * 6 COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING Case No. 2:19-cv-01697-JAD-DJA 7 COMMISSION,
8 Plaintiff, ORDER
9 v.
10 DAVID GILBERT SAFFRON, ET AL.,
11 Defendants.
12 13 This matter is before the Court on Gutke Law Group’s Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for 14 Defendants (ECF No. 108), filed on March 22, 2021. Pursuant to Local Rule (“LR”) IA 11-6, 15 “[n]o attorney may withdraw after appearing in a case except by leave of Court after notice has 16 been served on the affected client and opposing counsel.” See LR IA 11-6(b). Having reviewed 17 the motion, the Court finds that requirements of LR IA 11-6(b) have been met. Mr. Gutke 18 indicates that Defendants Circle Society Corp. and Gilbert Saffron have been unable to meet their 19 financial obligations and a breakdown in the attorney-client relationship has occurred. The Court 20 will require that Defendant Circle Society Corp. advise the Court if it will retain new counsel by 21 April 13, 2021 as it must retain new counsel if it intends to continue to litigate this matter. See 22 United States v. High Country Broad., 3 F.3d 1244, 1245 (9th Cir. 1993) (per curiam); In re Am. 23 W. Airlines, 40 F.3d 1058, 1059 (9th Cir. 1994) (stating that “[c]orporations and other 24 unincorporated associations must appear in court through an attorney.”). Similarly, Defendant 25 Gilbert Saffron must notify the Court if he will proceed pro se or retain new counsel by the same 26 date. Filing a notice of new counsel on or before April 13, 2021 is sufficient to comply with the 27 Court’s order. Failure to respond may result in a recommendation to the United States District 1 Judge assigned to this case that dispositive sanctions be issued against Defendants Circle Society 2 Corp. and Saffron including dismissal of this action. 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Gutke Law Group’s Motion to Withdraw as Counsel 4 for Defendants (ECF No. 108) is granted. 5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Circle Society Corp. and Gilbert Saffron 6 shall have until April 13, 2021 to advise the Court if they will retain new counsel. Failure to 7 notify the Court as to their new representation may subject them to dispositive sanctions, 8 including a recommendation for dismissal of this action. 9 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Gutke Law Group shall serve a copy of this order 10 on Defendants Circle Society Corp. and Gilbert Saffron and file a notice of completion of service 11 along with a notice of the defendants last known address by March 30, 2021. 12 13 DATED: March 23, 2021 14 DANIEL J. ALBREGTS 15 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Saffron, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commodity-futures-trading-commission-v-saffron-nvd-2021.