Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Fremer

Eleventh Circuit

Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Fremer

128 F. App'x 104

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided May 9, 2005·No. No. 04-13828; D.C. Docket No. 04-80132 CV-WPD·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We decline to address the applicability of Regulation § 32.9, because that issue was not raised in the district court. Appellants may request that the district court address the issue on remand.

With respect to the merits, we have carefully considered the several arguments of appellants, both in brief and at oral argument. However, we readily conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting the preliminary injunction. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We decline to address the applicability of Regulation § 32.9, because that issue was not raised in the district court. Appellants may request that the district court address the issue on remand.

With respect to the merits, we have carefully considered the several arguments of appellants, both in brief and at oral argument. However, we readily conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting the preliminary injunction. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Fremer, 128 F. App'x 104 (11th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

128 F. App'x 104 (Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Fremer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.