Committee to Preserve American Color Television v. United States

4 Ct. Int'l Trade 209
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Committee to Preserve American Color Television v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 527 F. Supp. 341
United States Court of International Trade·Decided November 15, 1982·No. Court No. 81-3-00258·Published

Opinion

Memorandum and Order

Maletz, Judge:

On this date, the court has issued an opinion and order denying plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. In anticipation of this action by the court, plaintiffs have moved pursuant to rule 62(c) for an injunction pending appeal. The standards for issuing such an injunction are, of course, identical in all material respects to the standards which are to be applied in determining whether or not to issue a preliminary injunction. Long v. Robinson, 432 F.2d 977, 979 (4th Cir. 1970); Beverly v. United States, 468 F.2d 732, 740 n. 13 (5th Cir. 1972); EEOC v. County of Los Angeles, 531 F. Supp. 122, 123-4 (C.D. Cal. 1982); 11 C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2904 (1977). Since the court has denied plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction on the basis that there is little, if any, likelihood of success on the merits of plaintiffs’ amended complaint, plaintiffs’ motion for an injunction pending appeal is likewise denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Committee to Preserve American Color Television v. United States, 4 Ct. Int'l Trade 209 (cit 1982).

4 Ct. Int'l Trade 209 (Committee to Preserve American Color Television v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related