Commitment Care, P.T., P.C. v. Travelers Home & Mar. Ins. Co.
This text of Commitment Care, P.T., P.C. v. Travelers Home & Mar. Ins. Co. (Commitment Care, P.T., P.C. v. Travelers Home & Mar. Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
against
Travelers Home and Marine Ins. Co., Appellant.
Law Office of Aloy O. Ibuzor (Michelle O'Meally Rogers of counsel), for appellant. Gary Tsirelman, P.C. (Darya Klein of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Mary V. Rosado, J.), entered February 10, 2017. The order denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant appeals from an order of the Civil Court which denied defendant's motion which had sought summary judgment dismissing the complaint upon the ground that plaintiff's assignor had procured the insurance policy in question by making a material misrepresentation as to the ownership and use of the subject vehicle.
"A misrepresentation is material if the insurer would not have issued the policy had it known the facts misrepresented. To establish materiality as a matter of law, the insurer must present documentation concerning its underwriting practices, such as underwriting manuals, bulletins, or rules pertaining to similar risks, that show that it would not have issued the same policy if the correct information had been disclosed in the application" (Interboro Ins. Co. v Fatmir, 89 AD3d 993, 994 [2011] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]).
Upon a review of the record, we find that defendant failed to establish as a matter of law that it would not have issued the policy in question. Consequently, defendant did not demonstrate, prima facie, that the misrepresentation by plaintiff's assignor was material.
Accordingly, the order is affirmed.
PESCE, P.J., WESTON and ALIOTTA, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: July 12, 2019
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commitment Care, P.T., P.C. v. Travelers Home & Mar. Ins. Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commitment-care-pt-pc-v-travelers-home-mar-ins-co-nyappterm-2019.