COMMISSO v. Orshan
962 N.E.2d 781, 18 N.Y.3d 876, 939 N.Y.S.2d 290, 2012 NY Slip Op 61168, 2012 WL 117939, 2012 N.Y. LEXIS 94
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 17, 2012
DocketMotion No: 2011-1322
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 962 N.E.2d 781 (COMMISSO v. Orshan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
COMMISSO v. Orshan, 962 N.E.2d 781, 18 N.Y.3d 876, 939 N.Y.S.2d 290, 2012 NY Slip Op 61168, 2012 WL 117939, 2012 N.Y. LEXIS 94 (N.Y. 2012).
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed Supreme Court’s denial of appellant’s motion to renew, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine *877 the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. ALMAH LLC
962 N.E.2d 781 (New York Court of Appeals, 2012)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
962 N.E.2d 781, 18 N.Y.3d 876, 939 N.Y.S.2d 290, 2012 NY Slip Op 61168, 2012 WL 117939, 2012 N.Y. LEXIS 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commisso-v-orshan-ny-2012.