Commissioners of the Treasury v. Mayrant

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Commissioners of the Treasury v. Mayrant

4 S.C.L. 228

DecidedNovember 15, 1807

StatusPublished

This text of 4 S.C.L. 228 (Commissioners of the Treasury v. Mayrant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commissioners of the Treasury v. Mayrant, 4 S.C.L. 228 (S.C. 1807).

Pincite

Opinion

Watxes, J.,

declared the resolution of the whole court, Treze-vant, J., absent, sick. That the verdict was wrong by reason of the interest which the jury had allowed, since it did not appear that the sheriff had been called upon for the money. But without this the verdict was legally conect, for the doctrine upon which it was founded, as laid down by the presiding judge at the trial, was perfectly reasonable and legal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watxes, J.,

declared the resolution of the whole court, Treze-vant, J., absent, sick. That the verdict was wrong by reason of the interest which the jury had allowed, since it did not appear that the sheriff had been called upon for the money. But without this the verdict was legally conect, for the doctrine upon which it was founded, as laid down by the presiding judge at the trial, was perfectly reasonable and legal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 S.C.L. 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commissioners-of-the-treasury-v-mayrant-sc-1807.