Commissioners of State Insurance Fund v. Ramos

38 A.D.3d 445, 831 N.Y.S.2d 320
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 27, 2007·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karen Smith, J), entered February 3, 2006, which, to the extent appealed from, denied the motion of defendants Ramos and J.M.R. Concrete of Long Island Corp. to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Despite efforts to mischaracterize this action as one for fraudulent conveyance, the court properly found that it is one to enforce a judgment, governed by the 20-year statute of limitations (CPLR 211 [b]), and thus timely commenced (see Solow v Domestic Stone Erectors, 229 AD2d 312 [1996]). Plaintiff’s factual allegations, accepted as true and liberally construed as they must be at this procedural juncture (see Cron v Hargro Fabrics, 91 NY2d 362, 366 [1998]), sufficiently set forth legally cognizable claims against these defendants (see Chase Manhattan Bank [N.A.] v 264 Water St. Assoc., 174 AD2d 504 [1991]). Concur—Tom, J.E, Williams, Buckley, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commissioners of State Insurance Fund v. Ramos, 38 A.D.3d 445, 831 N.Y.S.2d 320 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

38 A.D.3d 445 (Commissioners of State Insurance Fund v. Ramos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Amsterdam 140 LLC v. Fruitopia LLC
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026
Abacus Federal Savings Bank v. Lim
75 A.D.3d 472 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
County of Suffolk v. Love'M Sheltering, Inc.
27 Misc. 3d 1127 (New York Supreme Court, 2010)
Weadick v. Herlihy
46 A.D.3d 403 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)