Commissioners of Highways v. Fenton & Thompson Railroad

Appellate Court of Illinois

Commissioners of Highways v. Fenton & Thompson Railroad

135 Ill. App. 394, 1907 Ill. App. LEXIS 514

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedAugust 6, 1907

DocketGen. No. 4,799

StatusPublished

This text of 135 Ill. App. 394 (Commissioners of Highways v. Fenton & Thompson Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commissioners of Highways v. Fenton & Thompson Railroad, 135 Ill. App. 394, 1907 Ill. App. LEXIS 514 (Ill. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Willis

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an appeal from the Circuit Court of White-side county to review the action of that court in sustaining a demurrer to a petition for a writ of mandamus by the commissioners of highways of the township of Us tick, Whiteside county, and against the Fenton & Thompson Railway Company and the Chicago, Burlington So Quincy Railway Company, to compel them to restore to its former' condition a certain public highway in the said township of Ustick. The petition alleges that in 1904, the Fenton & Thompson Railway Company was constructed across the highway therein described at nearly right angles and about thirty feet above the highway, and that earth embankments, piles and trestle work of the railway occupied all but twelve and one-half feet of the highway. Under the fifth clause of sec. 20 of the Railroad Act, chap. 114, Hurd’s R. S. 1905, railroad companies have the right to cross a highway, but are required to restore it to its former state or to such state as not necessarily to impair its usefulness. The only objection urged to the petition is that it does not specify with particularity the manner in which the railway companies obstruct and unnecessarily impair . the usefulness of the highway. Whether this highway should be made wider or restored to its'full width, as argued by counsel, is a question that can only be determined upon a hearing. The petition having charged the obstruction in the terms of the statute and containing averments in regard to* the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Company leasing and controlling the railway formerly built by the Fenton So Thompson Railway Company, and this being admitted by the demurrer, the petition states a good cause of action.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is therefore reversed and the cause remanded with directions to overrule the demurrer.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Willis

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an appeal from the Circuit Court of White-side county to review the action of that court in sustaining a demurrer to a petition for a writ of mandamus by the commissioners of highways of the township of Us tick, Whiteside county, and against the Fenton & Thompson Railway Company and the Chicago, Burlington So Quincy Railway Company, to compel them to restore to its former' condition a certain public highway in the said township of Ustick. The petition alleges that in 1904, the Fenton & Thompson Railway Company was constructed across the highway therein described at nearly right angles and about thirty feet above the highway, and that earth embankments, piles and trestle work of the railway occupied all but twelve and one-half feet of the highway. Under the fifth clause of sec. 20 of the Railroad Act, chap. 114, Hurd’s R. S. 1905, railroad companies have the right to cross a highway, but are required to restore it to its former state or to such state as not necessarily to impair its usefulness. The only objection urged to the petition is that it does not specify with particularity the manner in which the railway companies obstruct and unnecessarily impair . the usefulness of the highway. Whether this highway should be made wider or restored to its'full width, as argued by counsel, is a question that can only be determined upon a hearing. The petition having charged the obstruction in the terms of the statute and containing averments in regard to* the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Company leasing and controlling the railway formerly built by the Fenton So Thompson Railway Company, and this being admitted by the demurrer, the petition states a good cause of action.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is therefore reversed and the cause remanded with directions to overrule the demurrer.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 Ill. App. 394, 1907 Ill. App. LEXIS 514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commissioners-of-highways-v-fenton-thompson-railroad-illappct-1907.