Commissioners of Greene County v. Holliday's Executors
3 N.C. 384
Opinion
Whether the passage referred to, be correct or rot, I conceive the evidence offered cannot be received; for Holliday bad not any I-.iorle.N-.- oí the contract between the commissioners attd Sheppard, except what he derived from the inspection of the order. If the evidence be good to explain what the parties meant, as between themselves, it cannot be so sw to third persons, who have governed tnemselves by the words weed in the writing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commissioners of Greene County v. Holliday's Executors, 3 N.C. 384 (N.C. Ct. App. 1806).
3 N.C. 384 (Commissioners of Greene County v. Holliday's Executors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clark v. . McMillan
4 N.C. 244 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1815)
Gatlin v. . Kilpatrick
4 N.C. 147 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1814)