Commissioners of Greene County v. Holliday's Executors

Superior Court of North Carolina

Commissioners of Greene County v. Holliday's Executors

3 N.C. 384

CourtSuperior Court of North Carolina

DecidedJuly 5, 1806

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 3 N.C. 384 (Commissioners of Greene County v. Holliday's Executors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commissioners of Greene County v. Holliday's Executors, 3 N.C. 384 (N.C. Ct. App. 1806).

Pincite

Opinion

1lull, Judge.

Whether the passage referred to, be correct or rot, I conceive the evidence offered cannot be received; for Holliday bad not any I-.iorle.N-.- oí the contract between the commissioners attd Sheppard, except what he derived from the inspection of the order. If the evidence be good to explain what the parties meant, as between themselves, it cannot be so sw to third persons, who have governed tnemselves by the words weed in the writing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1lull, Judge.

Whether the passage referred to, be correct or rot, I conceive the evidence offered cannot be received; for Holliday bad not any I-.iorle.N-.- oí the contract between the commissioners attd Sheppard, except what he derived from the inspection of the order. If the evidence be good to explain what the parties meant, as between themselves, it cannot be so sw to third persons, who have governed tnemselves by the words weed in the writing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 N.C. 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commissioners-of-greene-county-v-hollidays-executors-ncsuperct-1806.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack