Commissioners' Court v. Goldthwaite

35 Ala. 704
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 15, 1860
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 35 Ala. 704 (Commissioners' Court v. Goldthwaite) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commissioners' Court v. Goldthwaite, 35 Ala. 704 (Ala. 1860).

Opinion

STONE, J.

If this question rested alone on section 660 of the Code, we should doubt if printed blanks came under the general designation, stationery. This doubt, however, is removed by the act approved February 8th, 1858. — Pamph. Acts, 45. The last clause of the thii’d section of that act characterizes blanks as stationery. This is a legislative interpretation of the word, and, influenced by it, we hold that blanks, such as are the subject of the present controversy, are stationery within section 660 of the Code.

[2.] There is no error in the judgment for costs. — Court of County Commissioners v. Bowie, 34 Ala. 461.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crook v. Commissioners Court
39 So. 383 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1905)
Henrie v. Columbia County
16 Pa. Super. 339 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 Ala. 704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commissioners-court-v-goldthwaite-ala-1860.