Commissioner v. Sugar Daddy, Inc.

386 F.2d 836
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 28, 1967·No. No. 21213·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Taxpayers seek review of the decisions entered pursuant to the opinion of the Tax Court reported at 44 T.C. 233 (1965). The government concedes that the Tax Court erred in including income of E T Farming Company in the taxpayers’ income. In all other respects we affirm the Tax Court’s decisions, on the ground that the Tax Court was not clearly wrong in determining that the taxpayers failed to establish that they had transferred growing, unharvested crops to the taxpayers’ twelve corporations rather than transferring to the corporations proceeds from the sale of those crops.

Remanded for recomputation under Rule 50 in accordance with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commissioner v. Sugar Daddy, Inc., 386 F.2d 836 (9th Cir. 1967).

386 F.2d 836 (Commissioner v. Sugar Daddy, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Slota v. Comm'r
2010 T.C. Summary Opinion 152 (U.S. Tax Court, 2010)
Thor Energy Resource v. Commissioner
1995 T.C. Memo. 505 (U.S. Tax Court, 1995)
Wiseman v. Commissioner
1995 T.C. Memo. 203 (U.S. Tax Court, 1995)
Findley v. Commissioner
1991 T.C. Memo. 339 (U.S. Tax Court, 1991)
Estate of Sprenger v. Commissioner
1979 T.C. Memo. 196 (U.S. Tax Court, 1979)
Dougherty v. Commissioner
60 T.C. No. 97 (U.S. Tax Court, 1973)
Hempt Bros., Inc. v. United States
354 F. Supp. 1172 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1973)
E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. United States
471 F.2d 1211 (Court of Claims, 1973)
Bixby v. Commissioner
58 T.C. 757 (U.S. Tax Court, 1972)
Kirchner, Moore & Co. v. Commissioner
54 T.C. 940 (U.S. Tax Court, 1970)