Commissioner v. Snowden

Fifth Circuit

Commissioner v. Snowden

148 F.2d 569, 33 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1121, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 4292

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 11, 1945·No. No. 11212·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

This case, as the Porter and Lightner cases (Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Porter) 5 Cir., 148 F.2d 566, do, involves the question whether income received by the beneficiary of trusts created and managed in New York was separate or community property. The only difference be[570]*570tween this case and those is that in this case the taxpayer was a man. The same contentions are made, the same arguments advanced as in the Porter and Lightner cases. For the reasons given for affirming the decision of the Tax Court in those cases, its decision in this case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

This case, as the Porter and Lightner cases (Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Porter) 5 Cir., 148 F.2d 566, do, involves the question whether income received by the beneficiary of trusts created and managed in New York was separate or community property. The only difference be[570]*570tween this case and those is that in this case the taxpayer was a man. The same contentions are made, the same arguments advanced as in the Porter and Lightner cases. For the reasons given for affirming the decision of the Tax Court in those cases, its decision in this case is affirmed.

Commissioner v. Snowden, 148 F.2d 569, 33 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1121, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 4292 (5th Cir. 1945).

Pincite

148 F.2d 569 (Commissioner v. Snowden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related