Commissioner v. Mahler

228 F.2d 903
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided January 3, 1956·No. No. 9, Docket 23480·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We agree with and shall follow the decisions made on the precise point at issue here by our brethren of the Third, Fourth and Ninth Circuits. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Stockly, 3 Cir., 221 F.2d 745, affirming Stockly v. Commissioner, 22 T.C. 28; Hofferbert v. Marshall, 4 Cir., 200 F.2d 648, affirming Marshall v. Hofferbert, D.C.Md., 108 F.Supp. 350; Ford v. Commissioner, 9 Cir., 217 F.2d 886, adopting the reasoning expressed in the opinion of Judge (now Chief Judge) Murdock in the Stockly case, supra, after review by the entire Tax Court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commissioner v. Mahler, 228 F.2d 903 (2d Cir. 1956).

228 F.2d 903 (Commissioner v. Mahler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related